Searching for the "Rosalind Krauss Reinventing the Medium PDF" is often the first step for a graduate student preparing for a comprehensive exam or a researcher tracing the evolution of digital art theory. However, finding a legal, accessible PDF is only half the battle. The other half is understanding what Krauss means by “reinventing” a concept that many critics had declared dead. This article serves as a guide to the essay’s arguments, its historical necessity, and the ethical considerations of accessing the text. To understand why Krauss felt the medium needed reinvention, one must first understand what she was reacting against.
Lacan argued that a letter always reaches its destination. He used the story of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Purloined Letter” to suggest that meaning is not fixed but is generated by the structure of signifiers. Krauss adapts this to art. She claims that a medium works like a postal system: it establishes a circuit, a channel of communication that includes the possibility of noise, delay, return, and interception. rosalind krauss reinventing the medium pdf
Under Clement Greenberg’s modernism, the “medium” was defined by its physical limits. Painting was flatness and pigment; sculpture was volume and gravity. The goal of modernist art was to purify the medium, stripping away anything that belonged to another art form (literature, theater, architecture). By the 1970s, however, this logic had exhausted itself. Minimalism and Conceptualism attacked the very idea of artistic purity, leading many critics to declare the death of the medium. Searching for the "Rosalind Krauss Reinventing the Medium
For academic citation: Krauss, Rosalind. “Reinventing the Medium.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 25, no. 2, 1999, pp. 289–312. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344239. This article serves as a guide to the
The essay originally appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Critical Inquiry (Vol. 25, No. 2, Winter 1999, pp. 289-312). It was later reprinted in Krauss’s essential collection, Perpetual Inventory (MIT Press, 2010).
By the 1990s, the art world was in a state of theoretical vertigo. With the rise of installation art, video art, and digital media, it seemed that anything could be art. Krauss found this laissez-faire approach intellectually bankrupt. In her view, the simple declaration that "anything goes" failed to explain why some works of art had lasting power while others felt like lazy pastiche.