Save The World Instant Analysis — Criminal Case
Before Nuremberg, aggressive war was a policy. After Nuremberg, it was a crime. The "instant analysis" of that moment was that the mere existence of the tribunal altered the behavior of future belligerents. No subsequent head of state wanted to be cross-examined in a box.
Plausible deterrent, improbable rescue. The case is filed. The clock is ticking. We await the verdict. Disclaimer: This article is an analytical opinion piece. No actual criminal case has definitively "saved the world" at the time of publication. criminal case save the world instant analysis
Following the recent filing of what pundits are calling the “Apocalypse Indictment” at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the internet is buzzing with the phrase But is this hyperbole, or is there a mechanism by which handcuffs and habeas corpus could actually prevent global extinction? Before Nuremberg, aggressive war was a policy
So how does a criminal case "save the world instantly ?" No subsequent head of state wanted to be
The theory behind a "world-saving criminal case" is rooted in . Under the Rome Statute, it is a crime to intentionally cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment (Article 8(2)(b)(iv)). Until recently, this was a "sleeping provision."
For now, the world is saved by politics and physics. But just in case—the prosecutors are sharpening their pens.